A chilling revelation has emerged from a public inquiry into a series of deadly attacks in Nottingham, England. The triple killer, Valdo Calocane, made a shocking visit to MI5 headquarters, requesting to be arrested. This story takes an unexpected turn, leaving us with more questions than answers.
- A Survivor's Tale: Escaping a Nightmare
Last week, a brave woman shared her terrifying experience. She fell from a window while trying to escape Calocane's grasp on May 24, 2020. This incident occurred three years before Calocane's deadly rampage in June 2023. The 22-year-old survivor underwent spine surgery and revealed a chilling detail: a police officer informed her that Calocane couldn't be prosecuted due to his mental health status at the time. However, it's important to note that Calocane hadn't received a formal diagnosis for his mental health issues until July 2020, when he was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia.
The inquiry also revealed a chilling statement from the police officer, who told the survivor that if she hadn't escaped, Calocane "could have killed" her. This statement adds a layer of complexity to the case, raising questions about the potential severity of the situation and the officer's assessment.
- The Officer's Perspective: A Missed Opportunity?
PC Foster, the Metropolitan Police officer who responded to Calocane's visit to MI5, is facing questions about his handling of the situation. Sophie Cartwright KC, representing the survivors, asked a crucial question: "Was it not essential that somebody had to ask VC [Calocane] the question: 'Why have you come to Thames House asking to be arrested?'" Foster's response was that he was satisfied with Calocane's demeanor and the information provided, stating that Calocane seemed calm, compliant, and coherent.
But here's where it gets controversial: Did Foster miss a critical opportunity to gather more information about Calocane's intentions? Could a simple question have revealed more about his state of mind and potential threats?
- Intelligence Report: A Missed Connection
An intelligence report from the incident at Thames House on May 31, 2021, was sent to Nottinghamshire Police. This report, emailed by the Met Police on June 1, 2021, stated that Calocane was calm and compliant during his interaction with the police. However, it's unclear why this information wasn't acted upon or if it could have prevented the later attacks.
- A Calm Killer: The MI5 Encounter
Body-worn camera footage played during the inquiry showed Calocane appearing calm and collected when speaking to PC Foster outside MI5 headquarters. When asked about the nature of such visits, PC Foster stated that they are not infrequent and occur outside diplomatic or places of interest. Calocane claimed it was his "first time" visiting such a venue, and when asked about previous arrests, he confirmed he had been arrested before.
- The Triple Killer's Visit: A Chilling Request
On May 31, 2021, Calocane visited the MI5 headquarters in Westminster, making a chilling request to be arrested. PC Foster and another officer attended the scene. Calocane refused to disclose the reason for his visit, and when asked about his plans, he simply said, "go home." The inquiry revealed that Calocane had even booked an Uber to take him home, indicating a level of premeditation.
- Today's Hearings: Unraveling the Mystery
Today's hearings will delve deeper into this disturbing case. We'll hear from a Metropolitan Police officer who responded to Calocane's attempt to contact MI5, as well as another Met officer who manages threats to public figures and protected sites. Additionally, a former roommate of Calocane, involved in two incidents with him in 2021, is expected to provide crucial evidence.
- Live Coverage: Unveiling the Truth
Welcome to our live updates as we continue to follow the second week of hearings into the Nottingham attacks. Valdo Calocane's deadly spree claimed the lives of three people and injured three others in June 2023. As we uncover more details, we must ask: Could these attacks have been prevented? And what lessons can we learn from this tragic case?